Can You Get Warts From Waxing

The Sign Of Prime Creation


often reflected on my novel lately. I even rewrote the beginning, the first 10 pages. Then, rereading, I realized something. That no matter how beautiful, embellished details "realistic", it is too different from the rest of the book. At this point perhaps you need a premise.
I go on with this book since the days of the medium, it is all originated from a drawing made at the time, which I keep still. This drawing depicts the Eikha of the time, he had another name, with a sci-fi clothing. Initials should be a book of science fiction, fantasy turn took place afterwards, with the reading of Lord of the Rings . The actual drafting work was done strictly on paper, using the notebooks, and often writing in school. I have spent almost seven notebooks. I say almost because on the one hand there was the novel and the other drawings.
Then I copied everything on a PC, do not tell you the time you asked why you get scared. This coincided with the second draft, what was to be final.
Now we reconnect with what was mentioned above: the draft, despite having suffered obvious corrections, should be final. Or not? Let me explain. The style is different from that era that I have now, of course. I could rewrite all the style now, but would an immense task, and I'd take care of Canto Second.
So I decided one thing settle down a couple of little things such as descriptions of the fighting, but I will not use the new beginning, to avoid creating a soup of styles. Rimaneggerò a bit 'old one, with a policy: the reader believe the impossible, but improbable. This is a quote, but I do not know the author. Shall reserve my style then current for the Second Canto.
Ah, keep in mind that, at least in my opinion, the old style is neither better nor worse, perhaps simpler, but just different.

This reflection is also born by the results obtained by the experiment of one of duelli.Due people post here (shrimp and Duke) have criticized negatively to all others, is rather pleased. They are in clear majority, even if they do not have an account to comment on. So what do I think? That the public prefers the style of "old"?
And I would like to know from you what you think. Style "old" or total reworking of the original work to the detriment of honesty?
If its own, it will not like to settle down if no publisher.